Answer:
This question is incomplete, the options are missing. The options are the following:
A) Overbought condition.
B) Oversold condition.
C) Breakout on the upside.
D) Breakout on the downside.
And the correct answer is the option B: Oversold condition.
Explanation:
To begin with, the name of <em>"Oversold Condition"</em> refers to the situation where the price of an asset has reach a certain level that is relative low in comparison with the prices that it has have before. That situation can last for a long period of time so the most prudent way to act in the eyes of a trader is to wait until the price base out and start increasing.
So that situation in where the market price average is decreasing and reaching to its bottom is called Oversold Condition.
Answer:
The 1st plant with a storage reservoir is a better option as compared to that of the 2nd plant.
Explanation:
Suppose the factor for variation in hourly demand is 2 So the average hourly demand is given as
Average Hourly Demand=Factor x Average Daily Demand
AHD=2 x 18000 m3
AHD=36000 m3
For the first pump
The Quantity in storage tank is 3975 m3
So the amount of pumping required is
For this value the pump will work for following hours
So the pump 1 can complete the demand of the town by working for 18.3 hours.
Now in order to complete the demand, the second pump is given as
For this the pump will work for as
So the pump 2 requires 16 hours to complete the demand of the town.
Here it is important to note that the realistic demand of the water can vary from the average value and thus when there is a drastic requirement of water in certain cases, the pump 2 will fail. Also pump 2 has to be run continuously and will produce excessive water which will be wasted if the hourly demand is less than that of the production value.
In context of this, the 1st plant with a storage reservoir is a better option as compared to that of the 2nd plant.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I'm pretty sure cause The market contain huge numbers of buyers
Answer:
Neither nominal damages nor punitive damages.
Explanation:
Nominal damage is defined as money from a defendant that is awarded to a plaintiff for a legal wrong. The amount awarded does not meet up to the financial loss incurred.
Punitive damage is the type that is awarded to punish the defendant for an injury or wrong done to a plaintiff. This is also called exemplary damages.
In the given scenario the owner will not be able to recover either punitive or nominal damages from the movers.
This is because movers used a rope and pulley apparatus to lift the anvils on the outside of the building to a second-story window. This was aimed at not harming anyone within the building.
Also when it fell the anvil was not even dented.
So there was no basis for the negligence charge as there was no injury inflicted.
I think the answer is revolving door. Hope this helps!
