1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natasha_Volkova [10]
3 years ago
5

Provide ONE piece of evidence based on the Winter Palace that supports the argument that politicians used architecture to legiti

mize their rule, and explain how this piece of evidence supports this argument?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Bond [772]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The architecture justified and legitimized their reign, in that the further they supported great works of art and design, the more they cemented their leadership position.

It also made leaders feel that they are better than others. As in, "I rule over this enormous gigantic house. Look at me."

You might be interested in
Which statement provides the BEST evidence to support the conclusion that the Paleo Indians were the earliest and LEAST advanced
NeX [460]

Answer:  While later cultures lived in settled, permanent villages, the Paleo Indians lived a nomadic lifestyle. where

Explanation:

It is defined as Paleo Indians the first inhabitants of America and its evolutionary history on the continent. It is considered the beginning of its history in the year 8,000 B.C. This ethnic group was characterized by a nomadic lifestyle where hunting was the primary source of food.

Due to adverse weather conditions, the researchers theorize that the development of agriculture was difficult, and they continuously migrated in search of food and permanent settlements were not established. Later, when the weather conditions improved cultures such as the Inca or the Aztec developed methods of agriculture and large settlements.

Studying this period of prehistory has been difficult due to the few fossil evidence found.

I hope this information can help you.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
psychology section 1 the validity of a personal test is best indicated a group of students perceived a stationaey point
Licemer1 [7]

Answer:

a.

Explanation:

The validity of a personality test is best indicated by the correlation between test scores and some other relevant measure. This is because, like any other test, the validity of something is determined by whether or not the test actually measures what is is meant to measure correctly. Therefore to determine the validity of the personality test, test scores must be compared alongside another type of measurement regarding personality.

6 0
3 years ago
Explain how a cell goes from resting potential to action potential.
Nookie1986 [14]

The neuron goes from a polarized state at the resting potential (1) with the neuron more negatively charged inside than outside the membrane to a depolarized state during the action potential (2) with the cell positively charged on the inside.

4 0
3 years ago
A difference between flight 93 and the other planes involved in the september 11th attacks that
satela [25.4K]

On the morning of September 11, 2001 four different airliners were hi-jacked by members of Al-Queda. The first two planes, American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175, were flown into the two towers of the World Trade Center in New York City. A third plane, American Airlines Flight 77, hit the western side of the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. However, the fourth flight, United Flight 93, never reached its intended target as the crew and passegers on the plane fought against the hijackers. The plane crashed in a field in rural Pennsylvania. The actions of those on Flight 93 saved many lives.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why have corporations and unions been able to spend unlimited sums of money on campaign advertising since 2010?
Svetradugi [14.3K]

The corporations and unions have been able to spend unlimited sums of money on campaign advertising since 2010 because the Supreme Court ruled that campaign spending is a protected form of free speech.

Answer: Option  B

<u>Explanation: </u>

The Supreme Court in its judgement of a 2010 case fought between the parties 'Citizen United' and the 'Federal Election Commission' clarified that the expenditure made by a political party to communicate with its subjects forms an integral part of their freedom of speech and hence their spending on election campaigns cannot be capped by law.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was one reason that groups of Creek Indians clashed during the Creek Wars? A) They all wanted to control the same land. B)
    5·1 answer
  • What does intensity mean in science?
    8·2 answers
  • PSYCHOLOGY QUESTION
    9·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    15·1 answer
  • Who were the first humans to learn to built a fire
    13·2 answers
  • You have a choice to drill your water well into a shallow, unconfined aquifer or a deeper artesian aquifer. Drilling deeper will
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a reason that countries erect trade barriers such as
    8·1 answer
  • Please Help With No Links!
    11·1 answer
  • How many states were there after the American Revolution?
    12·1 answer
  • An what is used to measure tempatere
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!