Veichle is in operating condition
Answer:
related and supporting industries/complementors.
Explanation:
In the given scenario Toyota effectively leveraged on its related and supporting industries/complementors.
By having a tightly knit network of suppliers in Japan, Toyota developed a fast two-way knowledge sharing—this in turn improved their quality and lowered cost, which it leveraged into a successful blue ocean strategy.
The suppliers complimented their production efforts in such a way that quality improved and cost was lowered
Gasoline-powered automobile should be the answer.
I cannot explain the whole story, but PM me, if you'd like to hear it.
Good luck with your future studies,
Mabel L.
<span>The difference may lie in the project life, sometimes referenced as the planning horizon. A project may have a large internal rate of return (irr), but a very short project life. A second project might have a lower irr, but a much longer life. In that case, the second project will return less per year, but will provide a return for many more years, resulting in a higher pw.</span>
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
1. The standard cost for each one is as follows
For Direct materials, it is
= 9.6 pounds × $4.55 Per pound
= $43.68
For Direct labour, it is
= 1 hour × $15.80 per hour
= $15.8
For Variable manufacturing overhead, it is
= 1 hour × $3.40 per hour
= $3.40
For Fixed Manufacturing overhead, it is
= 1 hour × $6 per hour
= $6
2. The standard cost of one flower pot is shown below:
= $43.68 + $15.80 + $3.40 + $6
= $68.88
