Answer:
isn't an equivalence relation. It is reflexive but neither symmetric nor transitive.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
denote a set of elements.
would denote the set of all ordered pairs of elements of
.
For example, with
,
and
are both members of
. However,
because the pairs are ordered.
A relation
on
is a subset of
. For any two elements
,
if and only if the ordered pair
is in
.
A relation
on set
is an equivalence relation if it satisfies the following:
- Reflexivity: for any
, the relation
needs to ensure that
(that is:
.)
- Symmetry: for any
,
if and only if
. In other words, either both
and
are in
, or neither is in
.
- Transitivity: for any
, if
and
, then
. In other words, if
and
are both in
, then
also needs to be in
.
The relation
(on
) in this question is indeed reflexive.
,
, and
(one pair for each element of
) are all elements of
.
isn't symmetric.
but
(the pairs in
are all ordered.) In other words,
isn't equivalent to
under
even though
.
Neither is
transitive.
and
. However,
. In other words, under relation
,
and
does not imply
.
I don’t know but I think it’s 13,207,156
Answer:
I think it's A and D
Step-by-step explanation:
For option A, y would be the height or total growth, and x would be time or months and total height = 0.23 feet × 7.5 months
for option D, y would be the total amount of money spent and x would be the number of granola bars bought. total money spent = $0.23 × number of granola bars bought
Options B and C don't work because we don't know the initial values and an initial value would be represented in the equation.
In option E, 0.23 represents the total growth in 7 days, so it would be the total instead of the rate of change
Answer:
Cos A = 24/25, Tan A = 7/25
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that Sin A = 7/25
Sin = Opp/hyp
Therefore using Pythagoras theorem, adjacent will be;
= √(25²-7²)
= √576
= 24
Thus;
Cos A = adjacent/hypotenuse
= 24/25
Cos A = 24/25
Tan A = opp/hypotenuse
= 7/25
Tan A = 7/25
The answer is c to your question