All categories

3 years ago

Under each scenario given below, explain whether acl or capabilities would be a good choice for revocation. justify your answer.

Business

1 answer:

umka21 [38]3 years ago

5 0

The scenario presented for the question:

(i). Revoking an individual's access rights to a particular set of files, but not all files

(ii). Revoking access to a particular file from a group of users, but not all users.

Answer:

(i). Capability List would be a better choice

(ii). Access Control List (acl) would be a better choice.

Explanation:

(i). Revoking an individual's access rights to a particular set of files, but not all files

A capability list is a better choice here. All one needs to do is go to the individual's capability and remove the capability that gives the individual rights over those particular set of files one wants to revoke. This would not be possible for acl, as one would need to go to each file in the particular set of file to be revoked, confirm if the individual has a right for each file and then revoke. This process will take more time.

(ii). Revoking access to a particular file from a group of users, but not all users.

Access Control List (acl) would be a better choice because one can simply access the particular file acl and revoke the rights of the group of users they intend to.This is not the case for capability list, as one would need to confirm from the capability list of each user to know if they have access to the particular file and revoke their access. This will take more time.

You might be interested in

On April 1, Cyclone Co. purchases a trencher for $280,000. The machine is expected to last five years and have a salvage value o

avanturin [10]

Answer:

a). First year depreciation expense=purchase cost×rate=$112,000

b). Second year depreciation expense=$67,200

Explanation:

Step 1

Determine the depreciable value as shown

total depreciable value=purchase cost-salvage value

where;

purchase cost=$280,000

salvage value=$40,000

replacing;

total depreciable value=(280,000-40,000)=$240,000

Step 2

Annual depreciable value=total depreciable value/lifespan

where;

total depreciable value=$240,000

lifespan=5 years

replacing;

Annual depreciable value=240,000/5=$48,000

Step 3

Annual depreciation rate=(annual depreciable value/total depreciable value)×100

annual depreciation rate=(48,000/240,000)×100=20%

But since its double declining=20%×2=40%

First year depreciation expense=purchase cost×rate=(280,000×40/100)=$112,000

Second year depreciation expense=(280,000-112,000)×40%=$67,200

6 0

4 years ago

Along a given downward-sloping demand curve, an increase in the price of a good will: have no effect on consumer surplus. increa

tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

The answer to this question is the last item in the choices which is "decrease consumer surplus". Thus, we have it like along a given downward-sloping demand curve, an increase in the price of a good will also result to decrease consumer surplus. Also, when decrease consumer surplus is happening it will effect also to increase producer surplus.

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following would be considered a physical contaminant?

Cloud [144]

Answer:

Packaging staple is the correct example of physical contamination.

Explanation:

Physical contamination generally occurs in food when any foreign objects mostly hard and sharp objects that may result in injuries like choking, dental damage, and sometimes even death. Here, the packaging staple is a physical contaminant.

Other types of contamination are biological contamination and chemical contamination that occurs due to biological and chemical activities. The virus in a hamburger is an example of biological contamination, whereas, sanitizer residue and ice on frozen fish are examples of chemical contamination.

3 0

3 years ago

Asset A has an expected return of 20% and a standard deviation of 25%. The risk-free rate is 10%. What is the reward-to-variabil

kvv77 [185]

Answer:

0.4 or 40%

Explanation:

the formula used to calculate the reward variability ratio is:

reward variability ratio = (expected return - risk free rate) / standard deviation = (20% - 10%) / 25% = 10% / 25% = 0.4 = 40%

The reward variability ratio measures the return of a project, stock or investment, adjusted for its variability (standard deviation) compared to the risk free rate.

8 0

3 years ago

Bill schultz works at a high power investment firm in los angeles. bill is responsible for promoting the firm's vision and creat

leonid [27]

Strategic level of the pyramid.

6 0

3 years ago