Notice that a lien or other encumbrance may soon be filed on a parcel of property is known as a <u>Writ of association</u>.
A writ of attachment is a court order to "attach" or seize an asset.[1] it is issued through a court to a law enforcement officer or sheriff. The writ of attachment is issued with a view to fulfill a judgment issued with the aid of the court docket.
A prejudgment writ of attachment can be used to freeze the assets of a defendant while legal action is pending. Common grounds for acquiring a prejudgment writ of attachment are that a defendant has devoted fraud or that a defendant is ready to cover belongings from a court docket.
One species of this writ is known as a "writ of body attachment". This writ can be available to a court wishing to convey into its presence someone who has been held in contempt of the courtroom. In this situation, the writ is likewise sometimes known as a "writ of bodily attachment", an "order of commitment for civil contempt", or a "warrant for civil arrest".
Learn more about warrant here: brainly.com/question/1621452
#SPJ4
The statement is TRUE.
In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to <u>measure the dynamics of group-thinking</u>. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, <u>Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity</u>.
Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that <u>increasing group size</u> by up to three times, <u>raised the conformity levels to 32%</u>. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.
This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.
Hope this helps!
Answer: a. quid pro quo harassment
Explanation: In legal terms, a quid pro quo is a form of sexual harassment that can be found mostly in working places. It is a situation where one is of a superior position or standing and demands sexual relations as a favor from the other. It is commonly known as "this for that" or "scratch my back and i scratch yours" with sexual relations as the catalyst.
I hope this helps.
The correct answer is to ensure that the facts remain objective
Explanation: Vishal took notes because he wanted to ensure that the facts remain objective.
In Somalia, various high rates of maternal mortality, ra.pe, genital mutilation, violence, child marriage are frequently recorded because of the poverty and religion.
However, the woman experience poverty in the country more than the men.
Both the girls and women in Somalia suffer from poverty because of:
- lack of access to basic and essential feminine hygiene products
- lack of adequate sanitary hygiene products
- lack of job
- lack of education etc
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/26020872</em>
