1) the great awakening does not relate to the others
2) the navigation acts does not relate to the others
3) John winthrop does not relate to the others
4) I am not sure but I think jonathan edwards
5) triangular trade does not relate to the others
There were several reasons which lead to failure of western Indian Confederacy to limit white settlement west of the Appalachians. Firstly we see the settlement was open and there were large white settlers in eastern states. The increasing agricultural economy increased white settlements in the region. The US government also adopted the policies of treaty, trickery and warfare to acquire the Indian lands and increase white settlement in the region. On the other hand the Indians lacked enough weapons and army which also failed them in their efforts to limit white settlement west of Appalachians.
The New England colonists were predominantly Puritans who led strict religious lives. Laws in these colonies assumed that citizens who strayed away from conventional religious customs were a threat to civil order and should be punished for their nonconformity.
Roger Williams (1603 – 1683) was himself a puritan minister from Massachusetts Bay Colony. In his view, any civil authorities had no right to involve themselves in matter of faith. Banished from Massachusetts in 1635, he founded Rhode Island, the first colony with no established church and the first society in America to grant liberty of conscience to everyone.
Massachusetts Bay Colony was therefore the New England colony that did not require all adults to attend church service.
Answer:
govt. victory armed resistance eliminated minor tax evasion
Explanation:
Washington was alarmed, viewing it as a threat to the nations existence
Traditionally, faith and reason have each been considered to be sources of justification for religious belief. Because both can purportedly serve this same epistemic function, it has been a matter of much interest to philosophers and theologians how the two are related and thus how the rational agent should treat claims derived from either source. Some have held that there can be no conflict between the two—that reason properly employed and faith properly understood will never produce contradictory or competing claims—whereas others have maintained that faith and reason can (or even must) be in genuine contention over certain propositions or methodologies.
