Answer:
Learning
Explanation:
Learning is defined by many psychologists but the famous definition is that learning is the permanent change in the behavior by experience in life. The learning behavior focused on how people behave and react in the environment.
John B. Watson was the fist behaviorist who focused on learning due to experience. He suggests that all the behavior that occurs is the result of learning. It also suggests that the study on memory, cognition, and thought is too subjective that is very difficult to define. They have conducted a scientific study on behaviorism. It flourished to half of the decades and proposed many principles and aspects of learning.
Decomposers return nutrients in dead tissues, and wastes to the soil or water, producers can obtain these nutrients directly.
According to the lecture, all terrorists, from low-level foot soldiers to high-level leaders, engage in terrorism for the same reasons. This statement is False.
<h3>What is terrorism?</h3>
- Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence and fear to achieve an ideological aim.
- The term is used in this regard primarily to refer to intentional violence during peacetime or in the context of the war against non-combatants (mostly civilians and neutral military personnel).
- The terms "terrorist" and "terrorism" originated during the French Revolution of the late 18th century but became widely used internationally and gained worldwide attention in the 1970s during the Northern Ireland conflict, the Basque conflict, and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.
<h3>Who is a soldier?</h3>
- An army member is referred to as a soldier.
- An officer, non-commissioned officer, or conscripted or volunteer enlisted person are all considered soldiers.
Learn more about soldiers here:
brainly.com/question/9682613
#SPJ4
Answer:
i'd go with due process
Explanation:
The reason for this is that an impartial hearing doesn't have much to do with lifetime employment, free consent, or freedom of conscience. Then from privacy and due process, we can see that due process makes more sense because if their rights are being violated and they have an impartial hearing, this doesn't necessarily represent privacy (:
