They're the same because squares have 90 degree angles and that cut in half with a diagonal would make the angle acute at a 45 degree angle so depending on the lengths of the sides depends on the area, the angles have nothing to do with it because all squared have 4 right angles
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We would set up the hypothesis test. This is a test of a single population mean since we are dealing with mean
For the null hypothesis,
H0: µ = 5000
For the alternative hypothesis,
H1: µ > 5000
Since the population standard deviation is given, z score would be determined from the normal distribution table. The formula is
z = (x - µ)/(σ/√n)
Where
x = sample mean
µ = population mean
σ = population standard deviation
n = number of samples
From the information given,
µ = 5000
x = 5430
σ = 600
n = 40
z = (5430 - 5000)/(600/√40) = 4.53
Looking at the normal distribution table, the probability corresponding to the z score is < 0.0001
Since alpha, 0.05 > than the p value, then we would reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, at a 5% level of significance, it can be concluded that they walked more than the mean number of 5000 steps per day.
1-8 is simple. Just subtract 8 from 1. so 1-8 = -7
The image of the diagram is missing, so i have attached it.
Answer:
a = 30°
Step-by-step explanation:
From the diagram attached, we can see that the 2 angles a and 5a are interior supplementary angles.
The sum of interior supplementary angles is 180°
Thus;
5a + a = 180
6a = 180
a = 180/6
a = 30°
