I don't really understand the difference between these two, politically, culturally, and economically. All I know between the two is that the Roman Republic are for the citizens of Rome. However, the Roman Empire is ruled by a Emperors. Now, the connotations of emperors are considered bad I think. But isn't Marcus Aurelius and Augustus very good leaders. Does anyone have some insight on how Roman R and Roman E differ from each other.
<span>Immigrants and poor residents encountered having to live in less than livable conditions. They didn't have a lot of food and they had to leave family members in other countries to come to make a better life for themselves.</span>
The best way to check the reliability and validity of a resource is : B. analyze the author's education and professional background
Answer:
World war 2
Explanation:
After the end of the war, the russians would hold all of eastern Germany, and the U.S. Britian, and even France would hold western germany. Because the Russians were land hungry, they would hold the land they had, and to stop the spread of communism, the U.S. would hold the west. This would go on tell 1989, when the people were sick of the divison of there country, and tore down the Berlin wall, Communist Russia would fall 2 years later, in 1991