I need details, sweetheart.
Prior to the Civil War, the (dominant) discourse over the United States’ future reach a crisis point in that the divide grew between the North and the South over the status of slaves with the north favoring a more liberal view.
<h3>What were the arguments regarding the Constitutionality of slavery and notions of citizenship?</h3>
Throughout the mid-1800s, disagreements about the institution of slavery erupted, eventually leading to the Civil War: sociological reasons such as: whites being superior to blacks were presented.
The south contended that slaves were economically useful due to the steady work supply."
Hence the attrition.
<h3>How did relative definitions of liberty/freedom/equality become irreconcilable?</h3>
The relative definitions of liberty and freedom that became irreconcilable was when the notion of negative liberty was coined.
This notion was suggestive of the fact that:
Negative liberty is the freedom from outside intervention and that it is concerned largely with freedom from external restriction, as opposed to positive liberty (ownership of the capacity and resources to realize one's own potential).
Learn more about the civil war at;
brainly.com/question/1020924
#SPJ1
Invasion of the Moors. I hope I could help :D
Explanation:
In Obama the us is a constant in his speeches.
"We can", "we can", famous
slogan of a speech. A kind of complicity with people, whom wants to be part of its policy and objectives, as if this policy were not possible without them. We all make the change and together. I just can't - seems to want
say Obama.
This appeal to the us of discourse Obama is accompanied by resistance to the old policy, which does not look at citizens and focuses on struggles internal of the parties, which he calls the politics of the past, the dark politics.
A policy that needs to be changed on the other, but this renewal cannot
come from him only because only it cannot, but of all together.
