According to albert bandura, people who believe that their efforts will be successful and that they are in control of events have a high level of: Self-efficacy.
<h3>What is Self-efficacy?</h3>
Self-efficacy can be defined as the way in which a person tend to believe in their ability and skill to execute or achieve whatsoever they desire to achieve.
A person with self-efficacy personality tend to believe in themselves and their effort to achieve their set goals because they belief and have the confidence that they can achieve any thing they set to achieve.
Inconclusion according to albert bandura, people who believe that their efforts will be successful and that they are in control of events have a high level of: Self-efficacy.
Learn more about Self-efficacy here:brainly.com/question/1120411
Well all of them used guerrilla warfare, where you shoot, kill, and hide. Reload and do it again. <span />
It is an example of civic virtue. Civic virtue refers to the citizens' effort to support the community where them live by sharing moral values and other standard accepted by that specific culture. This could include voting, showing empathy (helping your neighbor) and so forth.
Answer:
Aggresive asimilation strategy
Explanation:
Clearly Eduardo is (or feels) in a disadvantage position compared to his classmates. By being in a wheelchair he feels vulnerable, yet he wants to fit in and be treated like a normal student. To achieve this he seems to be making a bunch of very radical moves: he completely <u>rejects other people</u> who are suffering similar problems as him, he <u>exceed´s his physical</u> capabilities (or at least get´s to the limits) <u>just to prove he can do it</u>, and he <u>ridicule himself</u> in front of other just to get acceptance.
Eduardo is not going easy at trying to be accepted, hes actually being very combative, specially towards himself, and that type of behavior is what is called Aggresive asimilation strategy.
Hope this helps!
Rating peer performance has an impact on the person being assessed as well as you, the reviewer because it demonstrates an objective assessment that demonstrates maturity and professionalism.
The advantages of rating peer performance are related to broadening the team's perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of each employee, as well as:
- More detailed feedback
- Systematized view
- Cooperation
- Integration
- Responsibility
Therefore, evaluating peer performance can make teams stronger through a closer perspective on the team's needs, making the team more integrated and motivated.
Through effective assessment, the reviewer will also benefit from demonstrating professionalism and maturity.
Learn more about peer performance here:
brainly.com/question/9624547