Let's solve your equation step-by-step.<span><span><span><span>2<span>x2</span></span>−<span>3x</span></span>−4</span>=0</span>Step 1: Use quadratic formula with a=2, b=-3, c=-4.<span>x=<span><span><span>−b</span>±<span>√<span><span>b2</span>−<span><span>4a</span>c</span></span></span></span><span>2a</span></span></span><span>x=<span><span><span>−<span>(<span>−3</span>)</span></span>±<span>√<span><span><span>(<span>−3</span>)</span>2</span>−<span><span>4<span>(2)</span></span><span>(<span>−4</span>)</span></span></span></span></span><span>2<span>(2)</span></span></span></span><span>x=<span><span>3±<span>√41</span></span>4</span></span><span><span>x=<span><span>34</span>+<span><span><span><span>14</span><span>√41</span></span><span> or </span></span>x</span></span></span>=<span><span>34</span>+<span><span><span>−1</span>4</span><span>√<span>41</span></span></span></span></span>
................
Step-by-step explanation:
it would at LEAST be like around 20-30 because a 0 can drop something FAST
<h3>Please markme as Brainliest .......</h3>
No.
Since w = 8, you must replace the variable with the number associated to it.
So, it would be 5 + 8 = 58
5 + 8 is not equal to 58, it is equal to 13.
If you wanted to find out what w was, simply subtract 5 on both sides.
w = 58 - 5
A unit of astronomical distance equivalent to the distance that light travels in one year, which is 9.4607 times 1012<span> km nearly 6 trillion miles.</span>
