Explanation:
y0dkgflhxhljgzkgzkdufhogkv a is ur answer
It would be the Rio Grande
Answer:
G
Explanation:
Burning non-renewable resources to generate electric power is extremely bad for the environment. This has been done in the past and continues at an even greater rate since the Industrial Revolution.
Although the Green Revolution is slowly replacing coal and petroleum with renewable resources, the large scale extraction and consumption of petroleum products has no historical precedent and the resources cannot be replaced.
Flooding because of dam failures, subsidence, etc. are secondary effects, whereas shaking of structures, liquefaction, etc. by faulting are direct damage.
<h3>What are secondary catastrophic effects?</h3>
Secondary effects are indirectly associated with the occurrence of a catastrophic event (in this case, a earthquake).
Moreover, direct damage makes reference to eventual immediate effects that such catastrophic events may have.
In conclusion, flooding because of dam failures, subsidence, etc. are secondary effects, whereas shaking of structures, liquefaction, etc. by faulting are direct damage.
Learn more about immediate catastrophic effects here:
brainly.com/question/7413514
#SPJ1
Answer:
beccaaaaudsssewkwkowpspdpdpd
