Answer and Explanation:
According to the given question, the computation is shown below:-
a. The amount and character of gain Charlie recognizes from end-of-the-year distributions is
Particulars Amount
Tax basis a $18,750
Ordinary income b $23,750
Stock basis $42,500
(c = a + b)
Distribution $47,500 ($42,500 + $5,000)
b. The stock basis is
Particulars Amount Character
Gain $5,000 Capital ($23,750 - $18,750)
Stock basis - None
Answer:
The requirement of the question is below:
Post the transactions to T accounts. (Post entries in the order displayed in the problem statement.)
The postings of the transactions to t accounts are found in the attached
Explanation:
In doing the post , I have observed strictly the rule of double that the giving account be credited and the receiving account be debited.
Also,this could be done understanding that assets ,expenses and drawings should be debited when they increase and the reverse when there is reduction.
Besides, liabilities,capital and income should be credited when they increase and the reverse for the opposite.
Check the highlighted balances as well and note that the balances are named after the side with balance brought down.
Incomplete question. The options read;
- Mary is correct, but only because Annie signed the note "Green" instead of "Greene" as indicated on the note.
- Mary is correct.
- Mary is incorrect.
- Mary is correct, but only because two payees are listed.
- Mary is incorrect unless she can prove that Susie intentionally and purposefully spelled the name wrong to prevent negotiation.
Answer:
- <u>Mary is incorrect.</u>
Explanation:
Indeed, since this just a case of name misspelling, the law in no clear terms states that such an endorsement would be counted as been illegal.
Remember, Mary acknowledges that the amount paid by Susie Smith was meant for both of them (Annie Green and Mary Hodge), hence there should be no question of illegality since funds were meant to be shared. In other words, this minor error can be overlooked.
