The correct answer is C. W.E.B. Du Bois (scholar and activist) was one of the most important African-American activists and the best known spokesperson for African-American rights of the first half of the 20th century. He was the co-founder of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (N.A.A.C.P.) and a supporter of Pan-Africanism.
Answer:
Though the Louisiana territory had changed hands between France and Spain a number of times, in 1800 Spain ceded the territory to Napoleon’s France. Napoleon, whose attention was consumed by war in Europe, began to view the territory as a needless burden. In 1803, he volunteered to sell all 828,000 square miles to the United States for the bargain price of $15 million.
Jefferson adhered to a strict interpretation of the Constitution and believed that without a specific enumeration of his right as president to acquire the purchase, buying the Louisiana Territory could plausibly be unconstitutional. The Federalists opposed the purchase for several reasons, chief among them the likelihood that new slave states would enter the Union from the southern parts of the territory.
Explanation:
A <u>democracy</u> is a political system that provides the opportunity to make a change in leadership according to the vote of the majority.
Usually, there are three political systems, autocracy, monarchy and democracy. Out of all, democracy places more power in the hands of people, that is why we call it government of the people, for the people and by the people. In a democracy, a leader can be chosen based on the votes of the majority.
This is done with the idea of investing more powers in the hands of people which is exercised by them directly or indirectly. Thus there are four different types of democracies- direct, indirect, constitutional and monitory.
To learn more about democracy, click
brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ4
Grant and Sherman used the strategy of total war to shorten the war in their favor, using the many deaths of enemies to save lives on their side. We may never know if more would've died if they didn't use the tactic, but in my opinion civilian lives were not theirs to take. Soldiers agreed to die, but civilians didn't, making total war, in my opinion, not right. Others may say that their lives were a necessary sacrifice towards a common goal, but, in my opinion, if one side uses total war, can't the other side use it too for a horrible end? Form your own opinion, but that is mine.
