Answer:
Choose CareCo.
Explanation:
Given : CareCo offers a generous health insurance package to all employees. ApathyInc pays slightly higher wages than CareCo, but does not offer health insurance.
A person who is unhealthy & expects to have high healthcare expenses : would have issues having direct health insurance from an insurer, based on high risk evaluation. Even if by chance, he/ she gets, it will be at extremely high price i.e premium rates & is likely to have less coverage. So, the person rationally would prefer to protect himself / herself from this huge health expenditure risk, & would protect self & family from catastrophic health costs. He / she would do so by choosing to work for Care Co, which gives generous health insurance to all its employees, by sacrifising higher salary by Apathy giving no health insurance. He/ she is logical as the wage differential is likely to be less than catastrophic health costs
Answer:
Option 3
Explanation:
Earnings & profits (E&P) is the measure of a corporation’s economic ability to pay dividends to its shareholders. An up-to-date E&P calculation is important for many corporate transactions, including determining whether a distribution to shareholders is a taxable dividend.
The E&P allocated to Andrew's distribution
= 160,000 * 150,000/(350,000+150,000)
= 160,000 * 150,000/500,000
= 48,000
Option C
Answer:
The correct answer is 777.169.56.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Payment per year (PMT) = $3,000
Time (N) = 40 years
Rate of interest (R)= 8%
So, the future value of the following can be calculated by using the following formula:
Future value = PMT × 
Now, put the value of the following in the formula. then,
= 3,000 × 
= 3,000 × 259.0565
= 777,169.56
Hence, the value in the account after 40 years will be 777,169.56.
Answer:
$2,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the consumer surplus
Consumer surplus=$30,000-$28,000
Consumer surplus=$2,000
Therefore consumer surplus is $2,000
I believe it's cross examination (the interrogation of a witness called by one's opponent). But I'm not 100% positive.