Wes measures the floor area of rectangular living room to replace the carpet with tiles. The length of the room is 2.6 feet grea
1 answer:
Answer:
Wes need 121.52 square feet of tile.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Wes measures the floor area of rectangular living room to replace the carpet with tiles
The length of the room is 2.6 feet greater than the width.
The width of the room is 9.8 feet.
Now, to find the square feet of tiles Will Wes need.
Width = 9.8 feet.
Length = 2.6 feet + 9.8 feet = 12.4 feet.
So, to get the square feet of tile we get the area of the room:
Therefore, Wes need 121.52 square feet of tile.
You might be interested in
Answer:
isn't an equivalence relation. It is reflexive but neither symmetric nor transitive.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let denote a set of elements.
would denote the set of all ordered pairs of elements of
.
For example, with ,
and
are both members of
. However,
because the pairs are ordered.
A relation on
is a subset of
. For any two elements
,
if and only if the ordered pair
is in
.
A relation on set
is an equivalence relation if it satisfies the following:
- Reflexivity: for any
, the relation
needs to ensure that
(that is:
.)
- Symmetry: for any
,
if and only if
. In other words, either both
and
are in
.
- Transitivity: for any
, if
, then
. In other words, if
are both in
also needs to be in
The relation (on
) in this question is indeed reflexive.
,
, and
(one pair for each element of
) are all elements of
.
isn't symmetric.
but
(the pairs in
are all ordered.) In other words,
isn't equivalent to
under
even though
.
Neither is transitive.
and
. However,
. In other words, under relation
,
and
does not imply
.