Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
1. Yes, making uninformed decisions is irrational. This is because it will cost the individuals making uninformed decisions to lose money in the process. Such individuals may also lose another important aspect concerning their decision, such as technological advantage, political assistance, social benefits, economic privilege, etc.
2. To determine how much information is the right amount is to ensure you continue to acquire information as long as the benefit of the additional information exceeds the additional costs. Otherwise, it is no longer the right amount anymore.
Radio-luminescent paints and signage, lantern mantles, vibrant ceramic glazes, and potassium-based salt alternatives are a few examples of items that contain radioactive substances.
An unstable radioactive material emits harmful radiation types. It is radioactive substances unstable because the electric force that seeks to separate the atom's nucleus from the rest of the atom is stronger than signage the strong nuclear force holding it together. The atoms will transform into more stable ones as a result of its instability.
Radioactivity can also be thought of in terms of energy. A radioactive atom radioactive substances contains more energy than it requires. When something has more energy than it requires, it will eventually lose signage that energy since the universe's energy tends to disperse. Energy in the universe cannot be generated or destroyed, therefore when a radioactive atom loses its excess energy through decay, it must go somewhere.
Learn more about radioactive substances here
brainly.com/question/1160651
#SPJ4
Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation:
Answer: Business can positively influence how society operates. It can build and maintain social capital through its core operations; the goods and services it provides; and the activities supported through increasingly global and complex supply chains.
Explanation:
Answer:
$62,160
Explanation:
Given:
Purchase price = $300,000
Down payment = 10% of purchase price = 0.1 × $300,000 = $30,000
Thus,
the cumulative amount to be financed = $300,000 - $30,000 = $270,000
The present value of an annuity of $1 per year for 8 years at 16% = $4.3436
Now,
Annual payment
= ( Cumulative Amount financed ) / ( Cumulative PV factor at 16% for 8 years)
= $270,000 / 4.3436
= $62,160.42
≈ $62,160
