Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. The complete question read;
The object in Image 1 best illustrates which of the following continuities in world history?
(A) The power of traditional elites was continuously challenged by the emerging power of new elites.
(B) The power of states was based on the ability of rulers to monopolize the use of violence.
(C) Artists depended on royal patronage for their livelihoods.
(D) Rulers used religious imagery to legitimize their political authority.
Answer:
<u>(D) Rulers used religious imagery to legitimize their political authority.</u>
Explanation:
We can make this assertion because the image seems to portray a blend between religious authority and political authority; because the caption seems to show that this religious object (the female ancestor spirit) was now used "FOR A KING’S CEREMONIAL SCEPTER".
In other words, the rulers now used religious imagery to legitimize their political authority, as if to say, they are been approved by their ancestors.
Answer:
The north used the rising number of immigrants to staff the industrial economy (factory jobs, warehouse jobs, etc...) the south felt no need to employ immigrants on their plantations because the invention of the cotton mill had made slavery a more economical option.
Explanation:
It allowed any religion to practice their religion without being punished. But the settlers couldn’t deny God. It was mainly aimed at the Catholics I believe. Another name is An Act Concerning Religion.
Answer:
Geneva Conference happened after first large conflicts that happened in the world after WW2, including Korean war and First Indochina war. Of course, this type of conflicts were to be prevented with the creation of United Nations, but obviously due to this conflicts this types of conferences were pretty often.
Explanation:
Conference that happened in 1954 immediately after a large conflict that happened in Korea. Besides that the decision of the conference were related to the process of decolonization in South-Eastern Asia, and it eventually led to creation of unified Vietnamese state.
I think they're making an attempt to seek out a typical<span> thread in their country. </span>I might prefer to<span> say that </span>they might prefer to apprehend<span> that </span>they might<span> be </span>a lot of possible<span> to be </span>concerned with the<span> deal or </span>one thing<span> else. Then, </span>you are simply quite showing<span> what it's </span>completely different<span> from the others, </span>even though<span> it's </span>simply a small distinction<span> and </span>you would like to elucidate<span>. </span>rely on<span> what was </span>happening<span> socially and politically with </span>every<span> country. Also, </span>rely on<span> what </span>each<span> of the countries' economy </span>seemed like<span> their military, were they </span>concerned in a very<span> war at the time, genocide? </span>these items may be in serious trouble<span> for you. Bush </span>created<span> the </span>bound<span> policies he </span>created for every<span> country. </span>and maybe might<span>|you'll|you may} have done </span>thus<span> with what countries or what policies </span>you think that<span> worked well or fell flat or what could have </span>created<span> them </span>higher<span> in your opinion.</span>
