A common misconception in statistics is confusing correlation with causation. If two events are correlated, it merely means that they share the same behaviour over time, but it doesn't imply in any way that those event are related by a common cause, or even worse, that one implies the other.
You can find several (even humorous) counter examples online. For example, if you plot the number of reported pirates assault against the global temperature in the last years, you'll se that temperature is rising (unfortunately...) while pirates are almost disappearing.
One could observe this strong negative correlation and claim that hotter climate has solved the pirate issue. Of course this is a joke, but it explains why you shouldn't confuse correlation with causation.
Answer:
The smaller number is 127
Step-by-step explanation:
Lets write the given problem in equation form
sum of consecutive numbers n and n + 1 = n + n + 1 = 2n + 1
now we find twice of the sum of consecutive numbers n and n + 1
2*(2n + 1) = 4n + 2
given that
twice the sum of consecutive numbers n and n + 1 is 510
thus,
4n + 2 = 510
=> 4n = 510 -2 = 508
=> n = 508/4 = 127
Thus, the numbers are n = 127
n+1 = 127 + 1 = 128
the smaller number is 127
Answer:Katie is 100 cm tall and is standing so that her mother's shado covers her shadow. She is 90 cm from her mother and her mother's shadow is 225cm long. How tall is her mother?
Step-by-step explanation:
