Answer:
construction is the correct answer
Answer:
Classical conditioning
Explanation:
In psychology, classical conditioning is a method of learning by pairing stimuli. Usually, first one stimulus causes a natural answer (the unconditioned stimulus causes an unconditioned answer), then this unconditioned stimulus is paired with another stimulus that doesn't cause an answer by itself at first but after some repetitions, the new stimulus (conditioned stimulus) causes the same answer from the unconditioned stimulus and this answer becomes the conditioned answer.
In this example, pets have learned to pair the sound of the electric can opener with the arrival of their canned food so they have learned to respond to this sound and therefore, they run toward the sound of the can opener even if there is no cat food present. <u>The can opener would be the conditioned stimulus which has been paired with the food (unconditioned stimulus) and has created the response of the pets running toward this sound (Conditioned answer). </u>Therefore this is an example of classical conditioning.
Feudalism began with people joining together in response to problems like these, danger from foreign invaders, the lack of a common currency or trade, and food shortages. So therefore they created a "system" called the Feudal System that would help them.
In most of medieval Europe, society was dependent on the feudal system, which was when a king or lord ruled large areas of land. To protect his land from attacks, the king gave parts of it to local lords, who were called vassals. In return, his vassals promised to fight to defend the king's land. If people wanted safety and defense, they had to live in a manor. People in the middle ages created small communities around a king or a lord. Most people lived in a manor, which consisted of a castle, a church, a village, a mill, and the surrounding farmland. These manors were isolated with huge walls, with rare visits from outsiders like merchants. Each manor was self-sufficient, which means that they made everything them selves, like food, clothes, and weapons. Self-sufficiency was very important in these days, because if they weren't able to grow food for them selves, there was no other way for them to get it.
The feudal system worked fine, because everyone had what they wanted and needed such as protection and food. For a peasant it was a very harsh life, if they were born there, they would probably stay there their whole life. Peasants had no rights to do anything except working for their lord, they paid very much for the right to live and grow crops on the lord's land.
The following is missing for the question to be complete:
A. Utilitarianism
B. Social responsibility
C. Consumerism
D. Preconventional morality
E. Distributive justice
Answer: A. Utilitarianism
Explanation: Utilitarianism is the doctrine according to which any procedure, rule, action, is good and useful if it suits the majority. According to this doctrine, the happiness and satisfaction of the majority should be the guide to which rules and norms should be harmonised. So, from the point of view of this doctrine, it is morally wrong to deprive most people of a popular student restaurant. It would be moral to meet the needs of the majority, to make the majority happy, and so the student restaurant would have usefulness, that is utility, hence the name of this doctrine. So the moral decision of what is good and what is wrong is made based on the outcome of the action or decision, and the outcome is good if it satisfies the majority.
