According to a different source, these are the passages that come with this question:
From "How Water Loss Affects Biodiversity":
<em>"When a region experiences a significant drought, many animals may die from lack of water and food. [...] If tourism declines due to high wildlife casualties, then the locals who depend on income from tourism will lose their livelihood. People may then turn to farming to earn money, but crops require water to grow. This can place further strain on the water supply and worsen the original problem of the drought."</em>
From "Water from the Air: Cloud Forests":
<em>"Once cloud forests are cleared, the damage can be irreversible. The cloud cover, which is so essential to their livelihood, disperses. The soil degrades and erodes, washing down the mountain slopes. Many species vital to the ecosystem die off."</em>
In these passages, the authors employ very similar language to describe the cycle that can take place in certain regions due to environmental degradation. In the first example, the author focuses on the effects of drought, and how this can impact the livelihood of people. He talks about the decline in tourism, and the effect on agriculture. He uses phrases with negative connotations such as "significant drought," "lose their livelihood," "further strain" and "worsen the original problem." All of these allow the author to explain the problems that arise in such a situation. On the other hand, the second passage also talks about the problems of a particular ecosystem, in this case, the loss of cloud cover. However, the article conveys a less negative or emotional tone. Moreover, the author does not mention how this loss affects human beings.
<u>Interactionism</u> is a psychosocial theory, where behavior is the result of social interaction, of the exchange of meaningful objects in everyday life.
<h3>What is interactionism?</h3>
It is a sociological framework that analyzes interactions, and their meanings, in order to understand the process through which individuals become competent members of a society.
<h3>Characteristics of interactionism</h3>
- It studies interaction and symbols as key elements to understand both individual identity and social organization.
- Through language things or objects are signified and their nature is given by the meaning it has for the subject who considers said object.
Therefore, we can conclude that interactionism studies human beings in a specific social context of meaningful objects; an issue that largely depends on the interactions we engage in.
Learn more about interactionism here: brainly.com/question/10236511
<span>Bullying would bring policies and phenomena pertaining to social inequalities such as the dismantling of social welfare systems, current anti-fat bias in medical and health research, continued criminalization of young men of color, widespread Title IX violations in education and laws that specifically target the civil rights of sexual minorities into a discussion about bullying such that this discussion would not solely focus on young persons’ seemingly random cruelty to another.
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
</span>
That statement is true
Some tribes divide powers among many chiefs depending on the way their govern their own tribes. The tribes that choose to divide the power would be operated similarly as modern democratic system, where each chiefs have their own responsibilities and cannot cross each other's jurisdiction.
The most prevalent attachment style among u.s. infants is the <u>secure</u> attachment style.
Attachment styles theory outlines how your bond with your primary caregivers sets the foundation for the way you navigate relationships during life. Attachment styles or types are characterized by using the behavior exhibited within a relationship, especially when that relationship is threatened. Consistent with the idea, there are 4 types of attachment styles:
- Avoidant (aka dismissive, or anxious-avoidant in kids)
- Anxious (aka preoccupied, or anxious-ambivalent in children)
- Disorganized (aka frightened-avoidant in kids)
The secure attachment style is the most common type of attachment in western society. research suggests that around 66% of the US population is securely connected. Humans who've developed this kind of attachment are self-contented, social, warm, and easy to connect to.
learn more about relationship here brainly.com/question/10286547
#SPJ4
