Answer:
D
Explanation:
He intended to harm the coach, not kill him, but he did kill the man with a purposeful hit, even if it wasn't intended for him
Answer:
The correct answer is C) Logical Thought.
Explanation:
Logical thought or logical thinking is a set of cognitive processes in which a person uses reasoning in a consistent manner with the goal of forming conclusions.
There are mainly two types of logical reasoning one called deductive and the other one is called inductive. Both allow the individual to come to certain conclusions.
In this particular case, the act of negotiating trades and developing strategies for improving collections are important exercises in that type of reasoning.
Therefore the correct answer is C) Logical thought.
Cuneiform is hard to translate today because it is one of the earliest forms of writing. The earlier it is, the fewer the people study it. Generation after generation, less people study it. Barely any people study it now. Since there are very few people that know cuneiform, it is hard to translate today.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
When we say that India has contributed to the development, peace, and stability within the developing countries, we are referring to the way important Indian leaders fought to get independence without violent acts. As was the case of the renowned pacifist Indian leader Mahatma Gandhi, who was one of the first leaders that were successful using his non-violent protests and demonstrations to demand the independence of India from the British crown.
Gandhi and his methods influenced other parts of the world and served as an example of civil non-violent resistance that has been followed in other developing countries.
Two ways that looting/ unrest exposed social injustices in South Africa are:
- showed that people were desperate for a better life
- showed that people lacked a lot of basic goods
The looting in South Africa that started July 2021 was as a result of a former President, Jacob Zuma, being arrested.
It showed that there was social injustice amongst the disadvantaged communities that mostly participated in the looting by:
- Showing that people lacked basic goods - the things that people looted from shops and malls were mostly items that would make their lives better. In stealing them therefore, they were showing that the social injustices they went through prevented them from buying these things on their own.
- Showing that people were desperate for better - a lot of people died during the looting as they would face vigilantes, other looters and the law yet this did not stop people from looting. It shows that people were so desperate for those goods that they could put their lives on the line to get them.
The looting / unrest in South Africa can therefore be conclusively said to be as a result of underlying social injustices imposed on their disadvantaged communities.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/24394967. </em>
