It was possible, as the Continental Army actually had more troops than the British Army in the 13 colonies. However, it would be a lot less likely.
It also depends what you mean by "without the French". Do you mean without the French Army, or do you mean no aid from the french at all? (no supplies, no arms, no ammunition, no training, no money, etc)
Answer:
As for Britain's response, it was initially no more than the dropping of anti-Nazi propaganda. leaflets-13 tons of them- over Germany. They would begin. bombing German ships on September 4, suffering significant losses.
Explanation:
I majored in History.
Answer: Politics in some parts of the colonies oscillated, and social movements that opposed slavery emerged.
Explanation:
It is essential to point out at the outset that the slave policy in the South and North was different. The south was entirely dependent on the slave labour, while in the north the slaves were in somewhat better conditions. However, when we talk about the north of More specifically New England, there were some oscillations in the colony. New England freed more and more slaves from year to year, primarily because of the fact that they were involved in the war. The colonial government in Rhode Island, which is an integral part of New England, sought to maintain a somewhat more rigid position on slaves, but all went towards freeing these people. Specific religious-social movements also emerged, which, by invoking moral principles, sought to eliminate slavery.
I believe the answer is Kettle hill.
