Answer:
The behavior of the worker is an example of Independent self.
Explanation:
Independent self lays emphasis on internal and distinctive personal characteristics, in which one's self is seen as a unique individual and fundamentally different from others.
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
Americans reacted to Sputnik 1 with fear and concern. Yes, United States citizens were concerned that they were inferior to the Soviets in terms of science, technology, and missiles.
Sputnik II Puts Dog In Space?
Yes, it is true. Its name was "Lanka." This dog was launched into space as part of the Soviet Union project Sputnik II, in November of 1957.
The plan for Sputnik II was to make tests and experiments in order to know what was needed to put a human into space.
Who did the Russian choose to send to space?
The Soviet Union decided to send astronaut Yuri Gagarin. He was the first human into space. His capsule was named "Vostok," which completed its orbit on April 12, 1961.
Another response to the launching of Sputnik by the Soviet Union in 1957 was that the US federal government began spending billions of dollars to improve American science education.
The space program had to be sped up because, in those years of the Cold War, it was inadmissible for the United States to behind the Soviet Union in the space race. The United States federal government also invested a lot in education and space research.
Answer:
Asset misappropriation.
Explanation:
Asset misappropriation is the most common type of fraud that people does. It is an fraudulent activity which occurs when any property of the company is stolen or is misused for some personal use.
In the context, two of the employees did fraud by not paying for the food they had. Payment of food at the office canteen was made though a kiosk and it was honorary. Such an example of fraud is called asset misappropriation.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
In the Schenck v. United States case, the US Supreme Court decided that the First Amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented a clear and present danger to society. Because of that, freedom of speech is not an absolute right, the government could restrict speech if the the words mean a clear and present danger to society.