The scientific community has their own definition of how the
natural world works and they had described that the natural world behaves in a
manner that is consistent and a way of having a manner that can be predicted or
is predictable with the use of given factors involving the natural world.
Regarding the suitability or not of bipartisanship in democracy, there are conflicting opinions. There are those who think that it is positive because it helps the political and general stability of a nation, while others believe that it supposes an unhealthy diminution of opinions represented in the agencies of power, and that there is no real opposition that fosters corruption.
In general, the bipartisanship leaves aside the opinions of people who do not identify with any of the parties. therefore their opinions, are not represented.
The correct answer is C) because they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view.
<em>In the majority opinion, Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. </em>
We are referring to the case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that was decided on February 24, 1969.
In 1965, five students decided to wear black armbands in protest of the Vietnam War and they were suspended by the school for doing that. In the majority opinion, Judge Abe Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. At the end of the case, the Court decided that the use of armbands as a protest was not a motive to cause any disruption and that the protest was protected by freedom of speech.
Answer: It's true, this is an example of consumer misbehavior, however there are some factors to consider.
Explanation: Although it is pretty evident that Michelle bought the dress in the first place because she liked it, what was done afterwards can be labeled as misbehavior for her plan to have the money back despite the article she already used for the ocassion she planned to attend with it. However, the cashier plays his/her part with the story because there is no evidence of refusal coming from what Michelle intends to do.
