9514 1404 393
Answer:
   see attached
Step-by-step explanation:
The related function is reflected across the x-axis and translated up 3 units. Effectively, it is reflected across the line y = 3/2. The graph of the related function is shown in blue in the attachment.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
1. Whole Foods has 8,742,202 more than Cosco
2. How much more does WHolefoods than Walmart
2a. Does Costco have more visitors than wholefoods or does wholefoods have more.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Use a calculator and calculate 9,556,096 and subtract 18,298, 298 and you will get 8,742,202
2.Answers to both questions :
Whole foods has 11,425,064 more than Walmart
Wholefoods has more visitors and has 8,742,202 more
 
        
             
        
        
        
Usually one will differentiate the function to find the minimum/maximum point, but in this case differentiating yields:

which contains multiple solution if one tries to solve for x when the differentiated form is 0.
I would, though, venture a guess that the minimum value would be (approaching) 5, since the function would be undefined in the vicinity.
If, however, the function is

Then differentiating and equating to 0 yields:

which gives:

 or 

We reject x=5 as it is when it ix the maximum and thus,

, for 
 
 
        
        
        
Answer:
x=3.5
Step-by-step explanation:
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
 
  
The p value for this case would be:
 
  
For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion is not different from 0.39
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=100 represent the random sample taken
X=36 represent the number of people that take E supplement
 estimated proportion of people who take R supplement
 estimated proportion of people who take R supplement
 is the value that we want to test
 is the value that we want to test
 represent the significance level
 represent the significance level
z would represent the statistic 
 represent the p value
 represent the p value 
Hypothesis to test
We want to test if the true proportion is equatl to 0.39 or not, the system of hypothesis are.:  
Null hypothesis: 
  
Alternative hypothesis: 
  
The statistic is given by:
 (1)
 (1)  
Replacing the info we got:
 
  
The p value for this case would be:
 
  
For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion is not different from 0.39