Answer:
Valence element of expectancy theory
Explanation:
Vroom, Herzberg, and Ma-slow give the theories in which they all focused on need satisfaction a person. Vroom differentiates between performance, outcomes, and efforts. But on the other hand Ma-slow and Herzberg, both focus on the relationship between the internal needs and their outcomes.
Valence is a term that focuses on the value output by the employee. In the positive valence, the person must attain the outcomes but do not attain the valence. The employee can be motivated by a good incentive such as money. Thus the person who pays more value money will attain money rather than an external time off.
The Valence expectancy work on perception rather than motivation. It can work for some but not for all.
Answer: In this context, rice, rubber, timber, kenaf, tapioca, sugar, copra, cattle, and fish are as much natural resources as tin, oil, bauxite, coal, and iron ore. The chapter presents broader connotation. Southeast Asia is a traditional producer and exporter of raw materials and of natural resources.
More context is needed, but this is true for Virginia.
Juvenile cases are organized differently in the states. and although the structure and functions are similar, the names are different.
In Missouri for example, they are part of Specialized Court Divisions.
<span>At first early human beings had to rely on hunting and gathering
in order to survive. During this period
they were able to identify some plants that can be edible. They were also able to learn how to use traps
to capture animals. Through their
hunting and gathering, they eventually learned how to plant and how to gather
animals and raise them in one spot. In
time, they were able to raise enough plants and animals for their needs that
some of these early humans can now settle in one area rather than roam the land
in search of food. Eventually these
small groups would grow in number and from a small family, you now have large
population living in one place and that is how towns began.</span>
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The first option is just outright not correct and makes NO sense
The bill of rights WOULD NOT prevent a civil war what so ever
D makes NO SENSE since the founding fathers modeled the Goverment to not have a king to begin with, the fought a war partially due to a King.
Leaving us with C, the bill of rights would set a line on where the Goverment could not touch the basic freedoms the Americans fought for in the Revoultionary War.
