John C. Calhoun--------hope this helps... rate me brainliest
Answer:
<h3>Freedom of speech.</h3>
Explanation:
- Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.
- However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
- Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.
Answer:
Louder music corresponds to more beer consumption. But this doesn't provide evidence that louder music can causes people to drink more beer.
Explanation:
The louder music does not cause people to drink more beer. There is a spurious correlation between drinking beer and Loud music because of the presence of confounding variable Social which is the interaction in the bar. The people at the bar are not able to talk to each other more because of the presence of loud noise or music. So, they are forced to drink beer more rather than talking during their stay at the bar.
Answer: The correct answer is: Intergenerational mobility.
Explanation: Intergenerational mobility can be understood as the changes in social positions that may occur in a family from one generation to the next. These changes can take place for a great number of reasons, including education, lifestyle choices and economic context.
<u>In this particular case, Jess is experiencing Intergenerational mobility because she earned an advanced degree and secured a prestigious job, distacing herself from the social position that her parents had.</u>