A team of scientists has consistently gotten the same unexpected results from a set of experiments. Then "Peer review of the scientific methods and data analysis" may helps the scientists to ensure the reliability of the results.
<u>Answer:</u> Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
The roots of achieving unexpected results lie or depend on scientific methods used and analysis of data performed for acquiring results. Therefore when experiment results into unexpected readings researcher need to give a review of entire method and analysis.
Although rest other points like publication of results, discussing with friends and family members or removal of inconsistent data may or may not help depends upon conditions but reviewing helps as observed in many cases , because one must have performed unintentionally or intentionally an error while going through methods.
Answer:Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees ( IACUC).
Explanation: it was formally introduced in 1986 with an amendment to the Animal Welfare Act and corresponding changes in U. S. public health service policy. It is the committee that investigates researcher to know if they are properly trained to perform animal procedures, as required by law.
In any ecosystem, there are factors to control populations. In a stream, the predators of a certain organism will help keep populations checked. Moreover, the limited resources, such as space and food, will keep the population from growing out of control.