Answer:
No, he would not
Explanation:
Machiavelli authored a popular books called the Prince. In that books, he presented his view regarding how the government should be operated.
He believed that the leader of the country should have absolute authority over the rest of the country. If the king told the people to do something , they have to obey it without any possibilities of fighting back.
The division of government into executive, legislative, and judicial branches contradict this principals. The division was created to Make the leaders of the country have lesser power. (for example, if the president want to do something unconstitutional, judicial branch can prevent it from happening)
<u>Yes, if he breaks any of the laws of nature, because these are the moral laws for Hobbes.
</u>
Violating the laws of nature can be not performing one's valid pacts as a ruler or not seeking peace when others want to do so and also not being grateful.
Moral limits that Hobbes places on the ruler are useless, because when we make a pact with the ruler, we give all of our natural rights away to the sovereign.
We cannot question/revolt because they've our rights.
Can only act if we are in danger ⇒ right to self - defense
The Intolerable Acts were five laws that were passed by the British Parliament against the American Colonies in 1774. They were given the name "Intolerable Acts" by American Patriots who felt they simply could not "tolerate" such unfair laws. The British passed these acts as punishment for the Boston Tea Party.
