1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
denpristay [2]
3 years ago
6

What reasons could Lincoln have for making such a move during the Civil War? Why didn’t Lincoln free slaves in all of the United

States?
History
2 answers:
olasank [31]3 years ago
6 0

Lincoln's main objective was to preserve the unity of his country, so he closely supervised the war effort, especially the selection of generals who would lead the army. In addition, the president made important decisions in the war strategy of the Union, including a naval blockade that prevented the trade of the southern states, the movements to take control of Kentucky and Tennessee and the use of gunboats to dominate the waterways. from the south. Lincoln repeatedly tried to conquer the Confederate capital at Richmond, a mission he commissioned successive generals until Grant succeeded. While the war was being waged, its complex movements to end slavery included the Proclamation of Emancipation in 1863.

Alex787 [66]3 years ago
6 0

1.

Such a move could disrupt the Southern economy and way of life if slaves decided not to help the Confederate war effort or decided to rebel against their masters.

The Proclamation gave the North a moral reason to continue fighting the war—the end of slavery.


2.

Border states—slave states that stayed in the Union—might strongly object to freeing all slaves during the war. Such a move might convince more people to join the Confederacy.

You might be interested in
During Washington’s presidency the first political parties were formed outlawed or eliminated
denis-greek [22]

The Federalist Party, referred to as the Pro-Administration party until the 3rd United States Congress, was the first American political party. It existed from the early 1790s to 1816.

7 0
3 years ago
Unter
WARRIOR [948]
American Revolution and French Revolution I believed
5 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between a monarch and capitalist
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

The only difference would be governor of the state is hereditary not democratic, but the inherent contradictions in the capitalist production

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as ________.
nevsk [136]

Answer:

The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as an illustration of the widespread hatred of Indians during the Age of Jackson.

Explanation:

When Jackson rose to power the situation with the American Indians was extremely tense. Just a few years before, in 1815, the country began to expand towards the west and ran into the tribes of American Indians who had inhabited the country for centuries. Those occupied lands aroused the desires of the colonies, which initiated a series of campaigns to get the Natives to travel further west in exchange for all economic royalties.

In fact, already during Jefferson's tenure (in office between 1801 and 1809) it had been established that the only natives who could stay east of the Mississippi would be those who had "civilized" and could coexist with the "white man." Based on this, those that had remained in the region were the Chicksaw, Choctaw, Creek, Seminole and Cherokee tribes. These, in exchange for maintaining their territories, had fixed their settlements, tilled the land, divided their land into private property and had adopted democracy. Some became Christian (at least in appearance) so as not to be expelled from the area.

In 1830, just one year after taking power, Jackson decided to solve the Indian problem by the brave. That is, creating a law to deport them further west. That year, the Indian Removal Act was passed, which obliged the Indians to move to lands west of the Mississippi and authorized the president of the United States to act against all those located to the east of the Mississippi river.

Officially, the politician made this decision because of the need for land to produce cotton and for "national security" (to avoid conflicts between Indians and Americans). However, in addition to these two causes and his own racism, Jackson also sought to create a human barrier between the United States and the regions under the control of other transatlantic powers. With them, Jackson not only sought to empty the Indian territories colonized west of the Mississippi Indian conflicts, but also create a security belt to the Spanish and British threat that was still installed in large North American territories.

Regardless of the cause, in practice, tens of thousands of Indians were urged to leave the houses in which they lived (their lands for centuries) to leave for "reserved" territories.

At the official level, Jackson claimed that the natives had the possibility of refusing this "relocation" and keeping their home in the United States. However, the reality was that the government (at the head of which was the president) exerted a brutal pressure on the tribal chiefs to leave. In addition, they made it clear that, in the face of the refusal, they would use force.

5 0
3 years ago
How did both the allies and the central powers try to gain the support of americans?
Pavel [41]

To gain backing of Americans, both the Allies and Central Powers used Propaganda intended to influence opinion. Governments during the First World War keen massive capitals and huge quantities of effort to creating material intended to shape opinion and action worldwide. The labors of states to defend their actions, and to build global support, caused in some of the most influential propaganda ever shaped. 

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • President Clinton wanted the U.S. to become involved with the ____ Protocol, but it has never been brought before the Senate for
    14·2 answers
  • How did Second Continental Congress influence the American Revolutionary War?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did America become involved in Vietnam
    15·1 answer
  • Adam Smith believed that fair prices for goods are determined in a capitalist system
    15·2 answers
  • The candidate who wins majority of the electoral votes becomes?
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE SOMEONE HELPOO
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a true statement about the Embargo Acts? A. They were not repealed until just a few days before Je
    11·1 answer
  • Why did philip ll of spain want to invade england?
    12·1 answer
  • What did John Hancock accomplish?
    15·1 answer
  • Plz plz plz answer answer answer i'LL GIB U BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT AND THANKS AND 5 STAR
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!