1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
denpristay [2]
3 years ago
6

What reasons could Lincoln have for making such a move during the Civil War? Why didn’t Lincoln free slaves in all of the United

States?
History
2 answers:
olasank [31]3 years ago
6 0

Lincoln's main objective was to preserve the unity of his country, so he closely supervised the war effort, especially the selection of generals who would lead the army. In addition, the president made important decisions in the war strategy of the Union, including a naval blockade that prevented the trade of the southern states, the movements to take control of Kentucky and Tennessee and the use of gunboats to dominate the waterways. from the south. Lincoln repeatedly tried to conquer the Confederate capital at Richmond, a mission he commissioned successive generals until Grant succeeded. While the war was being waged, its complex movements to end slavery included the Proclamation of Emancipation in 1863.

Alex787 [66]3 years ago
6 0

1.

Such a move could disrupt the Southern economy and way of life if slaves decided not to help the Confederate war effort or decided to rebel against their masters.

The Proclamation gave the North a moral reason to continue fighting the war—the end of slavery.


2.

Border states—slave states that stayed in the Union—might strongly object to freeing all slaves during the war. Such a move might convince more people to join the Confederacy.

You might be interested in
How did Martha Washington shaped our world?
Marina86 [1]

Answer:

During the American Revolution, Martha Washington assumed a prominent role as caretaker for her husband, appointed the General of the American Army by the Continental Congress, and his troops

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A country that has high political freedom typically offers high economic freedom low economic freedom a command economic system
VikaD [51]
A country that has high political freedom typically offers high economic freedom. 

<span><span>Part of a series on</span>LiberalismSchools[show]Ideas[hide]<span>Civil and political rightsCultural liberalism<span>Democracy <span>Liberal democracy </span></span>Economic liberalismEgalitarianismFree marketFree tradeFreedom of the pressFreedom of religionFreedom of speechGender equalityHarm principleInternationalismLaissez-faireLibertyMarket economyNatural and legal rights<span>Negative / positive liberty</span>Open societyPermissive societyPrivate propertyRule of lawSecularismSeparation of church and stateSocial contractWelfare state</span>Variants[show]People[show]Organizations[show]Regional variants[show]Related topics[show]<span><span> Liberalism portal</span><span> Politics portal</span></span><span>vte</span></span>

Political freedom (also known as <span>political autonomy</span> or political agency) is a central concept in history and political thought and one of the most important features of democratic societies.Political freedom was described as freedom from oppression or coercion, the absence of disabling conditions for an individual and the fulfillment of enabling conditions, or the absence of life conditions of compulsion, e.g. economic compulsion, in a society. Although political freedom is often interpreted negatively as the freedom from unreasonable external constraints on action, it can also refer to the positive exercise of rights, capacities and possibilities for action, and the exercise of social or group rights. The concept can also include freedom from "internal" constraints on political action or speech (e.g. social conformity, consistency, or "inauthentic" behaviour). The concept of political freedom is closely connected with the concepts of civil liberties and human rights, which in democratic societies are usually afforded legal protection from the state.

5 0
3 years ago
What type of land bordered the Nile River in Egypt?
artcher [175]
I think it’s deserts
4 0
3 years ago
"Individual Mississippians have the power to change society.”
densk [106]

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

No, Individual Mississippians does not have the power to change society because one individual is not enough for bringing change in the society, it needs a large number of people. When a large number of people decides to bring change in the society, it will happens due to the struggle of large number of people. A single person doesn't have the ability to bring change alone, he needs a group of people.

6 0
3 years ago
Why did the empires in the americas fall?
Anton [14]

Answer:

diseases brought over by the colonizers

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 4. Write down three examples of primary sources and three examples of<br> secondary sources.
    13·1 answer
  • A states responsibility for a public safety includes maintaining
    7·2 answers
  • Who invented the first computer?
    7·2 answers
  • Compare the standard of living of the country you chose with that of the United States. This should be written in a paragraph of
    14·1 answer
  • For what purpose was the gold used?
    14·1 answer
  • What was the main focus of perarch's poetry​
    5·1 answer
  • Help plzz
    15·2 answers
  • What were the themes that became
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true about Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and Henry Ford?
    5·1 answer
  • What are the aspects of Chinese traditional culture knowledge?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!