1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Misha Larkins [42]
3 years ago
5

What did the Homestead Act do? Check all of the boxes that apply.

History
2 answers:
nikdorinn [45]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

1 and 4

Explanation:

I just took it and got it right.

Scrat [10]3 years ago
5 0

Correct options: (1) It gave land to adult US citizens and (4) It required settlers to meet conditions to keep their land.

The Homestead Act opened up settlement in the western United States, allowing any Adult American citizens (including men, women and freed slaves) to put in a claim for up to 160 free acres of federal land. In exchange, settlers had to pay a small fee and live there for five years consecutive to keep the land, that is to say, get the ownership. They also had the option to buy it from the government after six months of residence.

You might be interested in
Please help me with #4
padilas [110]

Answer:

My friend will answer this soon.  He is logging into brainly right now so give him 5 minutes.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Why do you think australia registered no civilian deaths from world war i
Dahasolnce [82]
The reason why Australia registered no civilian death during WW1 is because the war was not fought in their lands. Being a member of the commonwealth, the country only contributed forces to fight for the crown like any other country that was part of the British empire by the time.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did britain plan to pay for the huge expenses of the french and indian war?
kogti [31]
New french became apart of the native colonist.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the song over there so important during WWl
zlopas [31]

Answer:

"Over There" is a 1917 song written by George M. Cohan that was popular with the United States military and public during both world wars. It is a patriotic song designed to galvanize American young men to enlist and fight the "Hun".

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the name of the leaders of the tainos and kalinagos called
    13·1 answer
  • Which event was most influential in the rise of a more active national government? select one:
    14·1 answer
  • Which constitutional power provides the basis for the president’s day-to-day control of U.S. foreign relations?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a regular outcome of being late for work?
    5·1 answer
  • which situation was a major outcome of the protestant reformation? A. Western Europe was no longer culturally unified by a share
    9·1 answer
  • What is a similarity between the geographies of Mesopotamia and China ?
    8·1 answer
  • In roe v. wade (1973), the supreme court was required to rule on the issue of ________, due to the fact that the pregnancy had a
    15·1 answer
  • How did The Kansas ­Nebraska Act affect border states
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following options supports the significance of the passage of the Declaration of Independence? It was written by Th
    15·1 answer
  • Name the 4 other locations the U.S. Military was sent during the 1990s?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!