Answer:
$133,600
Explanation:
Straight line depreciation expense = (cost of asset - salvage value) / number of year
Cost of asset = $340,000 + $14,000 + $40,000 = $394,000
($394,000 - $60,000) / 5 = $66,800
The amount of accumulated depreciation at December 31, 2018 = $66,800 x 2 = $133,600
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Please consult the Frequently Asked Questions web page before submitting new content to the webmaster.
Explanation:
Webmasters are responsible for the development, coordination, and maintenance of a web site. While sending a message before others submit content to webmasters about information the individuals might also find in the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), we should be objective and respectful at all moments. Thus, the phrase:
<em>Please consult the Frequently Asked Questions web page before submitting new content to the webmaster.</em>
<em />
Is the segment that best reflects the guidelines previously stated.
Moral Hazard occurs when a person increases its exposure to risk because someone else bears the the cost of those risk(Insurance companies)
Explanation:
Moral Hazard usually occurs when their is information asymmetry,the risk taking party has more information than the risk incurring party.
The financial crisis of 2008 is the best example of the Moral Hazard Problem.
The Moral Hazard Problem arises because the managers of the financial firm took over riskier investments because they believed that the federal government will save them from the bankruptcy.
Performing calculations and using equipment
Answer:
C. Neither Mary nor Sharon can claim breach of contract.
Explanation:
Mary buys a lottery ticket and promises to buy her friend Sharon a new pair of shoes if she checks the lottery results while Mary is away.
Sharon agrees to do so, provided she has the time for it.
If Sharon fails to check the results and Mary wins the lottery, then it would be true of the contract between Mary and Sharon that Neither Mary nor Sharon can claim breach of contract.
The reason is Mary's promise is based on the condition that Sharon checks the result, Sharon's promise is based on the condition that 'if she has the time for it.'
The condition was not met by Sharon hence she cannot claim a breach of contract because she did not check the results, similarly, Mary cannot sue Sharon because sharon made it clear that she will only check If she has the time.