Answer:
Relevant costs are costs that will be affected by a managerial decision. Irrelevant costs are those that will not change in the future when you make one decision versus another.
Explanation:Examples of irrelevant costs are sunk costs, committed costs, or overheads as these cannot be avoided.
The answer is adopting bylaws. In addition, unlike the articles of incorporation the bylaws are not public records and classically do not have to be gather in a line with any governmental unit. The bylaws will be accepted by the directors of the corporation at their first board meeting or accepted by the deed of incorporator and then accepted at the first board conference.
Answer: $12717
Explanation:
1. The amount of FICA and/or self-employment tax that Dave is required to pay on his compensation and his
share of the KBS income if KBS is formed as a C corporation, will be:
= 7.65% × $75000
= 7.65/100 × $75000
= 0.0765 × $75000
= $5738
2. As an S Corporation will be:
= 7.65% × $75000
= 7.65/100 × $75000
= 0.0765 × $75000
= $5738
3. As a limited liability company will be:
Dave's compensation = 75,000
Dave's portion of income will be calculated as:
= 50% × $30,000
= 0.5 × $30,000
= $15,000
Total will then be:
= $75000 + $15000 = $90000
We then calculate the net earnings which will be:
= 92.35% × $90000
= 0.9235 × $90000
= $83115
The FICA and/or self-employment tax that Dave is required to pay will then be:
= 15.3% × $83115
= 0.153 × $83115
= $12717
Explanation:
This is a complex issue that may reflect on the organizational culture of that company. As a leader, it is necessary to understand the situation and listen to both parties in order to find a favorable solution for the company and the employees. Since Marshall's work is important to the company, firing him at first may not be a favorable decision, what the leader can do is provide feedback to him about his interpersonal relationship at the company.
As an effective leader, it is necessary to constantly monitor the work and the relationship between employees, in which case it is necessary to understand the reason for Marshall's behavior and try to change the parameters and procedures that may be facilitating this behavior. It is necessary for him to understand that despite being an effective worker, the company is an integrated system that must be in perfect synchronicity for it to be successful in the market.
What the leader could do in this case then is to try to change the code of organizational ethics, seek training and psychological assistance for Marshall if necessary, talk to the workers who are part of the conflict to understand the situation in the best way, to seek a work redesign. , etc.
