Between the years 1778 and 1783, the nations of France and England disputed a war between each other. Both nations were the greatest powers on Earth during that time, and the conflict was a result of both parties trying to beat the other in relation to the amount of colonies they had, specially in America.
It can be said that the biggest winner of this conflict was neither France or England, but the United States of America. The north-american country benefited from the conflict for many years, simply by serving both sides.
I beleive the answer is : Russia
Territorial extent refers to the size of land in which a country has the full rights of all the resources that located on that land.
For comparison, United States and Canada pretty much has the same territorial extent but the Russian's extent could double both Canada and united states.
The chronological order of how events led to modern-day restrictions on voting rights is:
- After Reconstruction, discriminatory voting laws are passed that disenfranchise people based on race.
- The Voting Rights Act of 1965 requires federal oversight of voting rights in districts with a history of discrimination.
- More African Americans, Native Americans, Latinos, and Asian Americans vote and are elected to office.
- The Supreme Court rules in Shelby v. Holder that criteria to determine which districts need federal oversight are no longer valid.
- States again begin passing laws to restrict voting rights.
<h3>What is the history of voting rights in U.S.?</h3>
After the Reconstruction that came with the end of the Civil War, Southern States enacted laws aimed at keeping minority groups from voting.
These laws were overcome with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and more minority groups like African and Latino Americans were able to vote and get into office.
With the Supreme Court ruling in Shelby v. Holder in 2013 however, states began imposing restrictions again and especially in minority districts.
Find out more on voting rights in the U.S. at brainly.com/question/582433.
An infant who is <u>insecurely (resistant)</u> attached is very likely to display very high levels of distress when separated from a caregiver and then mixed reactions when reunited with the caregiver.
People with unstable attachment styles generally have a hard time building emotional bonds with others. They may be offensive or unpredictable towards their loved ones-behaviors that result from the consistent lack of affection they have grown up and experienced. Unsafe / Avoidable Attachments – Avoid contact with your mother, especially during reunions. Unsafe / Ambiguous Attachment-Get angry at the farewell, but don't greet your mother positively when you meet again.
The anxious attachment itself can contribute to anxiety, but anxious children are more likely to have difficulty adjusting their emotions and interacting well with their peers, which can further contribute to anxiety.
Learn more about infants here: brainly.com/question/3371222
#SPJ4
