Answer:
Price gouging is charging unnecessarily high prices for goods if they are in high demand in market. From a sellers perspective its profitable because he/she is able to get more profits on a good and because the goods have a high demand the goods will eventually be sold even on a high price.
From a consumers perspective if the good is a basic need and the consumer is paying high price for it, this can be frustrating but the consumer will have to buy it. If the commodity is not a basic need then the consumer can just stop buying that good and can substitute any other good.
Explanation:
Price gouging is charging unnecessarily high prices for goods if they are in high demand in market. From a sellers perspective its profitable because he/she is able to get more profits on a good and because the goods have a high demand the goods will eventually be sold even on a high price.
From a consumers perspective if the good is a basic need and the consumer is paying high price for it, this can be frustrating but the consumer will have to buy it. If the commodity is not a basic need then the consumer can just stop buying that good and can substitute any other good.
Answer:
The lending ability will increase by $2.25 billion.
Explanation:
The reserve requirement is given at 25%.
If federal reserve bank buys $3 billion in government securities, the total reserve will increase by $3 billion.
The excess reserve will be
=Increase in total reserve-required reserve
=$3 billion-25% of $3
=$(3 billion- .25*3) billion
=$(3-0.75) billion
=$2.25 billion
Answer:
The answer is: C) Attitude of others
Explanation:
The attitude of others refers to how much can another person´s attitude reduce what someone else prefers to buy. The extent of how much can a third party influence our purchasing decisions is based on:
- How intense is the third party´s negative attitude toward buying that specific product.
- How motivated we are to comply with the other person´s attitude.
Answer:
A. Competitive markets face perfectly elastic demand and marginal revenue, while monopolies face downward-sloping demand and marginal revenue.
Explanation:
In the case when competitive firms and monopolies generated at the level in which the marginal cost is equivalent to marginal revenue keeping the other things constant so the price should be less in the competitive market as compared to the monopoly because in the competitive markets it face perfectly elastic demand but in the monopoly it face the down ward sloping demand curve
Therefore the option a is correct
Answer:
Option 1 and 2
Explanation:
Complete Question
Which scenarios can be considered effects of Sole Sister Shoe Store choosing to sell dress shoes over sneakers?
CHECK ALL THAT APPLY.
-
High school athletes stop shopping there.
-
The inventory of sports socks goes unsold.
-
Publicity for the store declines.
-
Profits decline because dress shoes cost less than sneakers
Solution
Sole Sister Shoe Store chooses to sell dress shoes over sneakers because the customers of sneakers stopped shopping from the store. Sneakers are mainly purchased by the high school athletes over any other footwear. Now, they stopped shopping and hence Sole Sister Shoe Store started selling dress shoes
Also, sports socks' inventory is unsold indicating the reduction in sale of sneakers and hence the Sole Sister Shoe Store started selling dress shoes
