With the case study given above, it may be ascertained that,
- The want to avoid 'The CSI Effect' is a non-discriminatory reason to eliminate the jurors in general, as it does not conflict to any social discrimination based upon gender, race or other such factors;
- Furthermore, it is to be assumed that 'The CSI Effect' is directly tied to age as per the beliefs of Angela, and involves social discrimination based on the age of jurors.
<h3>What is social discrimination?</h3>
Any discriminative act, which directly relates to a biased behavior based upon the factors such as age, race, gender, ethnicity, and other such factors contained under Constitution lead to social discrimination.
As per the beliefs of Angela, her act of wanting to avoid 'The CSI Effect' conflicts a social discrimination for young jurors only, and not in general, as it is a discrimination of age.
Hence, the significance of social discrimination is aforementioned.
Learn more about social discrimination here:
brainly.com/question/13964317
#SPJ1
Answer: The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment, but the Eighth Amendment does shape certain procedural aspects regarding when a jury may use the death penalty and how it must be carried out.
Explanation:
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
The 12th congressional district of California is located in northern California. Since January 2013, Democrat Nancy Pelosi has represented the district. She has represented San Francisco's congressional districts since 1987.
<em>I hope this helps you</em>
<em>:)</em>
Regular reflection
1. In regular reflection the reflected light beams are always parallel to the incident light beam.
2. Regular reflection occurs from a nicely polished reflective surface.
Diffused reflection
1. In diffused reflection the reflected light beams are not parallel to the incident light bbeams.
2. It occurs from a diffused or irregular surface.
The answer is Quotation Marks
