Answer:
The scenario that holds true is the fact that " Arthur's termination is a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act because his HIV status did not affect his performance on the job."
Explanation:
The American with disabilities act was established in 1990. This is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in all areas of public life including jobs and all other public and private places that are open to the general public.
This statement is true.
In a market with a small number of sellers, known as an oligopoly, each seller's decisions have an impact on the outcomes of the other sellers.
Although there isn't a single theory to explain oligopoly, economists will occasionally employ a model known as the prisoner's dilemma to explain how oligopolistic market outcomes arise.
The prisoner's dilemma is a "game" that illustrates the advantages and dangers of cross-pollination among oligopolistic businesses.
A Nash equilibrium results from a prisoner's dilemma, where each player performs the best they can given what the other players are doing.
Oligopolist businesses frequently face the prisoners' dilemma, where they must choose between engaging in aggressive market-capture competition at the detriment of their rivals or engaging in "cooperation" and coexisting with the rival with the market share they already control.
To know more about oligopoly, visit:
brainly.com/question/3005866
#SPJ4
Answer: Option B -- The lack of social conflicts
Explanation:
Copycat crime is defined as one of the criminal acts, that's imitated by the previous crime committed. Copycat effect started in 1916 when a crime was imitated or modeled by Jack the Ripper. It was affected by the level of media distribution of the criminogenic content and by social context factors, which include:
(i) Social norms regarding deviance and violence
(Ii) The number of opportunities available to the potential offender to copy a crime technique
(iii) The nature, credibility, and pervasiveness of the mass media
Answer:
Under the traditional rules of legal duty in negligence cases, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant's actions were the actual cause of the plaintiff's injury.
Answer:
You should do this because trucks are heavier and more difficult to maneuver than a regular vehicle, thus you must take extra caution when driving near them to prevent serious injuries or sometimes death.
Explanation:
