Three judges sit on appeals courts, which do not employ juries. Whether or not the law was correctly applied in the trial court is something that the appellate court must decide.
The power of a court to rehear or reconsider a case determined by a lower court is referred to as appellate jurisdiction. The Supreme Court and High Courts of India both have appellate authority. They have the power to either reverse or sustain lower court rulings. To ensure that the proceedings were fair and the appropriate law was applied correctly, appellate courts examine the processes and rulings made by the trial court. The U.S. Supreme Court, the highest appellate court in the country, only considers appeals with significant weight and significance. There must be fundamental distinctions between trial and appellate courts, general and limited jurisdiction courts, and criminal and civil courts.
Learn more about appellate court here
brainly.com/question/29615850
#SPJ4
Answer:
No
Explanation:
the Articles of Confederation were not supposed to be temporary but it very quickly showed to be unuseful with many problems and holes in the articles. the constitution was made to be a better and more complex version of the articles
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
The state trial court in Nevada has issued a decision in which a party has been found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada courts will be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision.
Answer:
No, should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada state trial courts will not be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision, because the decisions of trial courts do not use precedents or rulings established in previous legal cases to arrive at decisions on future disputes involving different or entirely new parties.
