Hİ!
I'M İLAYDA.
I'M TURKISH.
<h3> THE TURKISH AUTHORS:</h3>
- Orhan Pamuk>>Orhan Cotton
- Elif Şafak
- Yaşar Kemal
- Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar
- Ömer Seyfettin
- Muzaffer İzgü
- Halide Edip Adıvar
Answer:
The intrinsic value of A -$44.57 is higher than that of B- $ 29.71
Explanation:
<em>The intrinsic value is the present value of he expected future dividend discounted at he required rate of return.</em>
<em>So, we would work out the intrinsic value of the two stocks using the the formula below:</em>
Intrinsic value = D× (1+r)/(k-g)
Intrinsic value of stock A
D-3, r-11%, g-4%
= 3 ×(1.04)/(0.11-0.04)
=$44.57
Intrinsic value of stock B
D-2, r-11%, g-4%
= 2 ×(1.04)/(0.11-0.04)
= $29.71
Answer:
Yes, it does.
Explanation:
It definitely impacts the present value analysis. If we are evaluating two proposals and we ignore the useful lives of the investments, then
- The present values of the investment proposals will be inaccurate.
- The cash flows might be inaccurate.
- The discount factor to be used will also be inaccurate.
- The overall results will be misleading.
- The tax credits and balancing allowances and charges will also be inaccurate.
The framers were insecure, and they doubted the public's ability to be politically capable and make good choices. They were concerned if the public would be able to come up with good political judgments.
A framer refers to a person, group, or organization that creates or frames laws, rules, plans, and systems of an institution. In the given sentence, the question is about the framers of political laws.
The public is sometimes swayed by the masses and also the media. They do not have the power to analyze and see the truth behind the politics of the rulers. Thus, it might be possible that the public might be swayed by some rulers and fail to make an unbiased judgment.
That is why the framers were concerned about the public's capacity to make good decisions.
To learn more about framers,
brainly.com/question/4921218
brainly.com/question/11629024
#SPJ4