I had to look for the options and here is my answer:
Based on the given scenario above regarding the changes that a young CEO made in his company, which resulted in the poor interpretation among his employees, the progressive companies at present would now incorporate strategies that continuously adapt a FORMAL AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION THAT AIDS IN CHANGES.
Answer:
He needs to know that it is not a scam and that its gonna be a fair I give you give.
Explanation:
Answer:
the total cost of ending work in process is $39,420
Explanation:
The computation of the total cost of ending work in process is shown below:
Equivalent cost per unit
Material = $301,600 ÷ 5,200 units = $58 per unit
Conversion = $405,500 ÷ 5,000 units = $81.10 per unit
Now ending work in process is
= 400 units × $58 + 200 units × $81.10
= $23,200 + $16,220
= $39,420
Hence, the total cost of ending work in process is $39,420
Answer:
The NPV is -$200956.3508. Thus, the shop will not be purchased as the NPV from this investment is negative.
Explanation:
To take the decision to buy or not buy the shoe store, we need to calculate the Net Present Value of the investment in the shoe shop. The net present value (NPV) is the present value of future expected cash inflows from the investment less the initial outlay/cost.
If the NPV is positive, the investment will be done and shop will be purchased and vice versa.
As the cash in flows consist of an annuity of 200000 for 11 years along with a principal sale value, the NPV will be,
NPV = PV of Annuity + PV of Principal - Initial cost
NPV = 200000 * [ (1 - (1+0.15)^-11) / 0.15 ] + 3500000 / 1.15^11 - 2000000
NPV = -$200956.3508
The shop will not be purchased as the NPV from this investment is negative.
The true statement about this natural monopoly is that It is more efficient on the cost side for one producer to exist in this market rather than a large number of producers.
- Also, it is a true statement that natural monopolies can earn positive profit in the long run without the government regulation.
<h3>What is a
natural monopolies?</h3>
This refers to the type of monopoly that exists in a particular market if a single firm can serve that market at lower cost than any combination of two or more firms.
It mostly occurs when when the most efficient number of firms in the industry is one. Also, a natural monopoly will ideally have very high fixed costs implying that it is impractical to have multiple firms producing the good.
A very good example of a natural monopoly is the case of tap water.
Hence, the true statement about this natural monopoly is that It is more efficient on the cost side for one producer to exist in this market rather than a large number of producers and it is a true statement that natural monopolies can earn positive profit in the long run without the government regulation.
Therefore, the answers are Option B and True.
Read more about natural monopoly
brainly.com/question/13113415
#SPJ1
