Answer:
B) We would know Mrs. Mallard's thoughts about her husband's death.
Explanation:
The given story is written from the third-person point of view. We can recognize this type of narrative by the use of pronouns<em> he, she, it, </em>and <em>they</em>. It feels as if the narrator is a person observing what is going on and telling us about it.
The first-person point of view is the one told from the first person. We can recognize this by the use of pronouns <em>I </em>and <em>we</em>. The narrator is one of the characters from the story, usually the main character.
If Mrs. Mallard was the narrator, we would know her thoughts about her husband's death. We would be looking at the events that take place around her through her eyes. We would know what she is thinking about and how exactly she is feeling. This is the effect of the first-person narrative.
I think the answer is A: Peace and Strength of the confederacy. Let me know if I am incorrect.
Thesis #1: One of the main themes in the first two chapters of The Call of the Wild is that men are just as greedy, violent and competitive as dogs when put in harsh circumstances.
The Call of the Wild is a story of transformation in which the old Buck—the civilized, moral Buck—must adjust to the harsher realities of life in the frosty North, where survival is the only imperative. Kill or be killed is the only morality among the dogs of the Klondike, as Buck realizes from the moment he steps off the boat and watches the violent death of his friend Curly. The wilderness is a cruel, uncaring world, where only the strong prosper. It is, one might say, a perfect Darwinian world, and London’s depiction of it owes much to Charles Darwin, who proposed the theory of evolution to explain the development of life on Earth and envisioned a natural world defined by fierce competition for scarce resources. The term often used to describe Darwin’s theory, although he did not coin it, is “the survival of the fittest,” a phrase that describes Buck’s experience perfectly. In the old, warmer world, he might have sacrificed his life out of moral considerations; now, however, he abandons any such considerations in order to survive. Buck is a savage creature, in a sense, and hardly a moral one, but London, like Nietzsche, expects us to applaud this ferocity. His novel suggests that there is no higher destiny for man or beast than to struggle, and win, in the battle for mastery.
No i don't think emerson would have called beowulf a hero and i emerson hero could slay a monster like grendel.
1. The correct option among all the options given in the question is option "B" or the second option. It will be a "verb".
2. <span>The correct option among all the options given in the question is option "B" or the second option. It will be a "verb".
3. </span><span>The correct option among all the options given in the question is option "C" or the second option. It will be an "adjective".</span>
