Answer:
I think many Israelis oppose giving up settlements and occupied lands in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip because, settlements make what Israelis and Palestinians call "new realities on the ground." Palestinian people group are part separated and their association with the land debilitated, while Jewish people group put down roots in an area implied for Palestinians. As a result, it obscures or obliges the limits of any future Palestinian state. For certain pilgrims, this is the point: they need the West Bank a completely fused as Israeli area and are attempting to get that going.
Explanation:
This is what I put and got it correct lol.. copy+paste It went through a paraphrasing tool sooooo.
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future.
Explanation:
The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be RACIAL DISPARITIES. <span>Widespread adoption of intermediate sanctions may further exacerbate racial disparities in prison populations. Intermediate sanctions is defined as </span><span>new punishment options developed to fill the gap between traditional probation and traditional jail or prison sentences </span>Hope this answers your question. Thanks for posting it.
I believe the answer is Controversy
Controversial documentary tends to attract a lot of attention from media, both media corporations or small independently owned media such as a blog.
This rapidly increase the popularity of the documentary and resulted in a lot of viewerships
