Answer:
it hink asasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasd
Explanation:
There is a lot of options. Since I have learned this, why don't you research about Cristopher Columbus? He is a bad guy and a good guy. You can also research about the American Revolution, the Boston Tea Party, etc. There are many options , and it is your choice. After all, you should choose it your self because you may not know how hard some of them are. If you really need info about Christopher Columbus, please message me.
I would love to help.
Answer:
self-serving bias
Explanation:
The scenario being described is an example of a self-serving bias. This is mainly when someone blames other people or factors for the bad things that have happened to them. In this scenario, the girls are blaming the umpire as the reason that they lost the match, but in reality the girls most likely lost the match because they did not play as good as the oppossing team. For the team it is much easier to blame the umpire instead of accepting that the reason for losing was due to their own lack of practice.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is true that this is an example of a positivistic explanation of criminal behaviour. Positivistic explanations focus on the connection between criminal behaviour and external factors. These theories argue that criminal behaviour is often due to social, political or economic circumstances that put pressure on a person and encourage him or her to act in a deviant way. Sam would be a good example of this theory, as he encountered many problems in his life that might have encouraged him to act in a criminal way.
That statement is false.
It more closely emulates <span>a </span>self-synchronizing stream cipher. The initialization vercot would be encrypted before added to the plaintext block.
The output feedback would encrypts the initialization vector to create a set of random characters for emulation of a <span>stream of pseudo-random digits.</span>
