Discrimination 100 the real answer is that and it will not make since at dirt but it is have a good day
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Please kindly go through the attached file for a step by step approach to the question.
Answer:
-$150
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
(I - E) / 12
Where,
I = total income
E = total expenses
I = $52,000
E = $53,800
(I - E) / 12
= (52,000 - 53,800) / 12
= -1,800 / 12
= -150
-$150 shows that Mr. Engle's total expenses exceeds his total income per month with an average of $150
