PEMDAS states that the value in the parenthesis should be evaluated first:
4(5*6)
4(30)
After just multiply the value in the parenthesis by the number outside of the parenthesis:
120
I’m pretty sure it would be 4, since y= (x) which would be the numbers on the chart and then add 2
ex: y= (2) + 2
y= 4 and so on
Answer:
C) The parabola is narrower and reflected across the x-axis.
Step-by-step explanation:
The original parabola has equation:

The transformed parabola has equation

How wide the graph is can be determined by the absolute value of the coefficient.
The smaller the absolute value of the coefficient, the wider the graph.
Since

The original graph is wider than the transformed graph.
Also the negative factor tells us there is a reflection in the x-axis.
This gives you three simultaneous equations:
6 = a + c
7 = 4a + c
1 = c
<u>c = 1
</u><u /><u />
If c =1,
6 = a + 1
<u>a = 5
</u><u /><u />
This doesn't work in the second equation, so the quadratic that goes through these points is not in the form y = ax^2 + bx + c
Was there supposed to be a b in the equation?
The vertices of two rectangles are A(−5,−1),B(−1,−1),C(−1,−4),D(−5,−4) and W(1,6),X(7,6),Y(7,−2),Z(1,−2). Compare the perimeters
valkas [14]
The two rectangles are not similar. actually WXYZ is not a rectangle at all. it is a polygon but not a rectangle. hope the visual helps..