Us federal income tax is progressive by law, but which best explains why is it sometimes regressive in practice?

2 answers:

3 0

I believe the answer is: High-income earners use tax laws to their advantage to reduce their tax rates

High income earners tend to possess financial knowledge or ability to allow experts who understand the full scope of taxation laws and how to recorded the transactions in a way that make it eligible for tax deduction. This makes a lot of high income earners manage to avoid paying taxes even if they manage to obtain a lot of profit.

NikAS [45]3 years ago

3 0

"High-income earners use tax laws to their advantage to reduce their tax rates" is what best explains why the US federal income tax is progressive by law, but it is sometimes regressive in practice. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and the answer has actually come to your great help.

You might be interested in

Why don't many developing countries benefit from the spread of free trade?

Annette [7]

My best guess is A because they maintain high tariffs on the agriculture custom many developing countries export.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What reasons would retailers have for marking prices lower

UkoKoshka [18]

To attract customers to their store and not their more expensive competitors?

4 0

3 years ago

A firm that is threatened by the potential entry of competitors into a market builds excess production capacity. this is an exam

Pavel [41]

A firm that is threatened by the potential entry of competitors into a market builds excess production capacity. this is an example of a credible threat.

A credible threat is one in which there is a real possibility that the member may soon do serious physical harm to other people (including death), and that possibility cannot be completely eliminated by changing any existing rules, norms, or practices.

A system holding State data or a product delivered by the Consultant that has an exploit that a person with knowledge of information technology security believes may be used to compromise one or more parts of the system constitutes a credible danger.

To learn more about Credible Threat here

brainly.com/question/20226868

#SPJ4

6 0

1 year ago

It will cost $3,500 to acquire a small hot dog cart. cart sales are expected to be $1,500 a year for three years. after the thre

sergejj [24]

Answer:

well in 3 years you will get 4,500 so you will get a profit of 1,000 but hats in three years pls mark as brainliest.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

An investment management firm has been hired by ETV Corporation to work on an additional public offering for the company. The fi

jeka94

Answer:

b. Place the company on a restricted list and give only factual information about the company.

Explanation:

There is an ethical problem in the scenario that borders on professional code of conducts in the area of objectivity and independence.

It was stated in the scenario that ''the head of the investment banking department has asked the head of the brokerage unit to change the recommendation from "sell" to "buy."

This is a case of wanting to interfere with the objectivity of the recommendations which should be based on facts not bias.

Secondly, the head of investment banking is trying to interfere with the independence of the head of brokerage unit.

According to the Standards, the head of the brokerage unit would be permitted to place the company on a restricted list and give only factual information about the company.

8 0

3 years ago