Answer:Mean world syndrome
Explanation:
Mean world syndrome is a mental bias in which we see the world as a dangerous place more that it is in reality due to having been exposed to issues of extreme violence on television.
Mean world syndrome occurs to us in a form of fear, anxiety , pessimism and always feeling like there are threats all around us. Media is the powerful tool that influence this behaviour due to how it portrays the world stories to the viewers.
The increasing violence stories portrayed on TV daily makes a person who watches television constantly start believing that the world is real an extreme dangerous place based on what they see on TV.
Work, for example is the subject of an entire branch of psychology. psychological, behavioural, emotional, and social factors.
The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P), developed by the UN, shows the growing importance of human rights by It is criticized for becoming a justification for intervention on behalf of state interests not related to protection of human rights.
<h3>The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P)?</h3>
All Heads of State and Government endorsed the duty to safeguard populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity at the 2005 World Summit. Three equally important pillars support the responsibility to protect (commonly abbreviated as "R2P"): the obligation of each State to protect its citizens (pillar I); the obligation of the international community to support States in protecting their citizens (pillar II); and the obligation of the international community to act when a State is blatantly failing to protect its citizens (pillar III). When the concept was adopted in 2005, it was a solemn commitment with high hopes for a world free of these atrocities.
- There are several circumstances in today's world where populations are at risk of R2P crimes or where such crimes are already occurring. These crises are occurring in a climate of waning internationalism, declining adherence to international human rights and humanitarian law, political division in important decision-making bodies like the Security Council, and a degree of defeatism toward advancing ambitious agendas like protection.
- Alarming contempt for core principles of international law has been on display. We are witnessing widespread and egregious attacks on protected civilian sites, such as hospitals and schools, as well as on protected individuals, including humanitarian and health-care workers, in many of the armed conflicts that have broken out in recent years.
- The most severe transgressions of international humanitarian and human rights law, which may qualify as atrocity crimes, continue to be committed by the armed forces and auxiliary militia of States, which is a depressing reality given the rise of violent, non-state armed organizations.
- Similarly, governments do not hold those responsible for atrocity crimes accountable for their deeds. In order to prevent the investigation and prosecution of atrocity crimes, some States parties to the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court, are not collaborating with the Court or are even considering withdrawing from the Statute.
- The Security Council is becoming less willing to bring issues to the Court, and certain political figures obviously want to avoid being held accountable in court.
Learn more about Protect (R2P) here:
brainly.com/question/16179318
#SPJ4
The American Indian groups or Native Americans had no idea of money and no economies, not until the European immigrants introduced it to them. Even though a lot of time has passed when they were introduced to the ideas of economy and money, a lot of them declined the use of money as they believed that money is evil in nature.
Answer: less tightly organized.
Explanation:
The interest group or specific interest group is an association of the peoples, organizations and institutions that aggregate to create a social movement in order to influence the public policy or the rules of the government in their favor. The members of the interest group generally have the common believes and interests to affect the judgement of the government.But generally the groups are less tightly organized because they may not remain stick to their demands for long. The group may loose unity.
