If its question so this
The history of ancient Egypt is divided into three main periods: the Old Kingdom (about 2,700-2,200 B.C.E.), the Middle Kingdom (2,050-1,800 B.C.E.), and the New Kingdom (about 1,550-1,100 B.C.E.). The New Kingdom was followed by a period called the Late New Kingdom, which lasted to about 343 B.C.E.
if true or false
answer is true
uwu
The direct democracy or pure democracy it´s a form of democracy in which the people directly decides on policy initiatives, it differs from the representative democracy; the one that it´s currently established in the majority of the countries; because in that the people choose the representantives and they are those who decide the policies to carry on. In the representative democracy the people do not govern, it´s a common mistake to mix both concepts.
Two different forms of direct democracy are participatory democracy and deliberative democracy. The deliberative democracy is a form in which the deliberation it´s a central matter to the decisions and it is seen as an amalgalm of the direct and the representative democracies. It holds that for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by an authentic deliberation not a mere voting.
The participatory democracy is one that emphasizes the broad participation of everybody but it demands to the citizens to be more involved in the political participation.
I think that a group taking a vote on something is an example of a participatory democracy because everyone have the same power to create consensus and, at last it would win the iniciative that obtain more votes. If the example was a representative democracy then the group would have to vote for only one person to make a decision and then the group will follow the "leader" choice althought it goes against the majority of what the group wants.
I hope the answer to be useful for you. Regards.
C) Civil war left Egypt weak and poorly defended, and Egypt fell to the Macedonian conqueror Alexander the Great.
since it is decline, it has to be defeated
hope this helps
Answer:
b. FBX is a dominant allele.
Explanation:
If Darren's father has the gene for FBX and Darren's mother does not have this gene, but Darem has the disease, it means that the disease is encoded by a dominant allele.
We can draw that conclusion, because as we have seen, the alleles that Darren received from his mother and father responsible for bone development are different, so one is dominant and the other is recessive. Recessive genes are only expressed and homozygous, that is, Darren would only express the gene for bone development if both his father and mother donated recessive alleles.
On the other hand, dominant genes are expressed, even in the presence of a recessive gene. Therefore, we can say that the gene that Darren received from his father is dominant and was expressed even in the presence of the recessive gene, which Darren received from his mother.
